The release of the Chinese AI app DeepSeek has sent shockwaves through financial markets and the global tech industry. DeepSeek’s claim that its R1 artificial intelligence model was developed at a fraction of the cost of its competitors has not only challenged industry norms but has also led to significant repercussions for some of the world’s largest tech companies. In a short period, DeepSeek has risen to become the most downloaded free app in the US, a feat that has brought it into direct comparison with established AI giants like OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini.
This comparison highlights a critical moment in the AI industry, where innovation is not exclusive to the traditional powerhouses of Silicon Valley. With a mix of unique features and cost advantages, DeepSeek is forcing its competitors to take notice. But how does it actually stack up against the widely recognized ChatGPT in terms of capabilities?
Contents
Writing Assistance
One of the most popular uses of AI chatbots is writing assistance. ChatGPT has long been celebrated for its ability to generate content ranging from summaries to detailed blog posts, making it a valuable companion across workplaces.
To test both platforms, a task was set: summarize the best Scottish football players of all time and draft a blog post about them. DeepSeek responded quickly with a top-ten list, placing Kenny Dalglish, the legendary Liverpool and Celtic player, at number one. Its response included details about each player’s position, clubs, and notable achievements. Surprisingly, DeepSeek also included two non-Scottish players—Brian Laudrup and Henrik Larsson—explaining their impact on Scottish football and acknowledging Larsson’s Swedish nationality.
ChatGPT’s response was equally detailed, offering a similar list of names with additional context about their careers. It concluded with a statement emphasizing the timeless legacy of these players. Both platforms demonstrated competence, but their approaches differed. DeepSeek excelled in providing structured, concise answers, while ChatGPT leaned toward delivering more detailed narratives.
Coding Capabilities
The advent of advanced AI models has been transformative for programmers, offering assistance in everything from debugging to complex problem-solving. ChatGPT has been a go-to tool for developers, with its occasional outages prompting amusing complaints from users on social media about their reliance on the chatbot.
DeepSeek, however, appears to be a serious contender in this space. Javier Aguirre, an AI researcher at Samsung Medical Center in South Korea, recently shared his experience with DeepSeek, praising its ability to solve a particularly tricky coding issue that ChatGPT’s o1 model could not resolve. His experience demonstrates that DeepSeek’s reasoning capabilities in coding may exceed expectations.
Notably, some professionals are combining multiple models to achieve optimal results. Addy Osmani, Google’s Head of Chrome Developer Experience, mentioned using DeepSeek in tandem with Anthropic’s Claude Sonnet for coding. Osmani highlighted DeepSeek’s cost advantages, describing it as significantly cheaper than both Claude Sonnet and OpenAI’s o1 model. This affordability, coupled with impressive performance, gives DeepSeek an edge in the programming arena.
Brainstorming Ideas
Another area where AI tools excel is in brainstorming creative ideas. When asked to generate ideas for a children’s story about a boy living on the moon, ChatGPT provided six distinct and imaginative summaries. These included stories about Max, a lunar postman sent on an adventure, and Oliver, who discovers an alien orchestra on the moon.
DeepSeek, on the other hand, approached the task differently. Instead of providing multiple ideas, it generated a single, fully developed story titled “Luna and the Boy Who Chased the Stars.” The story followed a boy named Milo who embarks on a simple journey from point A to B. While it lacked the depth or creativity of ChatGPT’s responses, it demonstrated an impressive ability to generate a coherent narrative almost instantly.
ChatGPT’s strength lies in its variety and ability to inspire further creativity, while DeepSeek’s focus on execution and speed showcases its potential for users who prefer ready-to-use content.
Learning and Research
AI tools are increasingly being used for educational purposes, including learning about historical events and conducting research. When tasked with explaining the causes of World War I—a complex topic—ChatGPT delivered a thorough account, outlining the key factors that led to the conflict, such as the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and the intricate alliances between European powers.
DeepSeek’s response, while less detailed, managed to cover the main points succinctly. Its approach was more suitable for users seeking a quick overview rather than an in-depth analysis.
Google’s Gemini added another layer to the comparison by incorporating links to reputable sources, such as the Imperial War Museum in the UK, allowing users to explore further. While all three models performed well, the differences in depth and presentation highlighted their individual strengths.
Affordability and Accessibility
One of DeepSeek’s most significant selling points is its cost-effectiveness. Reports suggest that DeepSeek’s operating expenses are much lower than those of its competitors, making it an attractive option for businesses and individual users alike. This affordability has likely contributed to its rapid rise in popularity.
For coders and researchers, the reduced costs make DeepSeek an appealing alternative, particularly when its performance is comparable to or better than more expensive models. This raises questions about whether established firms like OpenAI and Google will need to adjust their pricing strategies to remain competitive.
The Future of AI Competition
The emergence of DeepSeek underscores a pivotal moment in the AI race. Despite the vast resources that US tech giants have invested in developing AI technologies, DeepSeek has shown that innovation is not limited to established players. By offering comparable capabilities at a lower cost, it has proven that the field remains open for disruption.
Prof. Neil Lawrence of the University of Cambridge highlighted the significance of this development, comparing it to historical innovations like James Watt’s improvements to the steam engine. Watt’s contributions, while not the original invention, revolutionized industry. Similarly, DeepSeek’s ability to innovate within the AI space may inspire a new wave of competition and advancements.
This scenario suggests that the winner of the so-called AI race is far from decided. New players like DeepSeek are demonstrating that they can challenge the dominance of traditional leaders, potentially reshaping the future of the industry.
Final Thoughts
DeepSeek has made an impressive debut, showcasing capabilities that rival and, in some cases, surpass those of established AI models like ChatGPT. Its strengths in writing assistance, coding, and cost-effectiveness make it a formidable competitor in the AI space. While ChatGPT continues to excel in areas like creativity and detailed analysis, DeepSeek’s rapid rise and affordability have positioned it as a serious contender.
The AI landscape is evolving quickly, and DeepSeek’s success serves as a reminder that innovation can come from unexpected places. As the competition heats up, the future of AI promises to be both exciting and unpredictable. The question is no longer about who dominates now but rather who will lead in the years to come.
